RohitKrOfficial
Member
- Joined
- 28 Dec 2018
- Messages
- 106
- Solutions
- 1
- Reaction score
- 149
- Thread starter anandbb
- Start date
- Replies: Replies 61
- Views: Views 20,932
RohitKrOfficial
Member
- Joined
- 28 Dec 2018
- Messages
- 106
- Solutions
- 1
- Reaction score
- 149
Well we can give benefit of Doubt to BJP because they are more digitally Inclined then OLDied Gehlot who is opposing just for shake and presenting himself as pro--poor
But i donot give benefit of doubts to our babus as they are all same across the sate...
Between i have noticed that more old a congressmen becomes ,(know that his time in INC is up) , he starts behaving as if he is more pro-poor
Let's be realistic in other countries cops do such operations without taking Internet off. Vigilantes who has to distrupt peaceful atmosphere will do it anyway. Keeping millions off internet shouldn't be an option. Police needs to be trained to tackle misinformation without keeping Internet off.
Meanwhile that is banned because of law and order situation. That can be justified. But banning during exams is stupid when you can easily install jammers. You don't need to cause inconvenience for everyone.
Meanwhile that is banned because of law and order situation. That can be justified. But banning during exams is stupid when you can easily install jammers. You don't need to cause inconvenience for everyone.
- Joined
- 1 Feb 2019
- Messages
- 3,038
- Solutions
- 3
- Reaction score
- 6,402
Blocked internet access cannot be justified unless it was absolutely last option. There should be set of prerequisite conditions that must be fulfilled before ordering net block.
In Punjab a blanket ban across whole state was completely unnecessary and misuse of government powers. There was normal situation in most places.
When global media and somewhat national ones started reporting against it and a PIL was filed in the High Court, the government promptly lifted that ban on wireless internet for everywhere except only about 5 districts. This should have been the approach from 2nd day itself.
In Punjab a blanket ban across whole state was completely unnecessary and misuse of government powers. There was normal situation in most places.
When global media and somewhat national ones started reporting against it and a PIL was filed in the High Court, the government promptly lifted that ban on wireless internet for everywhere except only about 5 districts. This should have been the approach from 2nd day itself.
Optimus_Prime
Contributor
- Joined
- 5 Oct 2015
- Messages
- 9,713
- Reaction score
- 14,758
Mr. Ambani brought changes in mobile industry, he came with the cheap plan so that Internet can be used by everyone...
But he failed to see other side of the coin
And due that we are seeing Internet shutdown cases after each and every small to big incident.
People still donnot know how to use internet sensitively.
That is bad truth which We cant deny.
But he failed to see other side of the coin
And due that we are seeing Internet shutdown cases after each and every small to big incident.
People still donnot know how to use internet sensitively.
That is bad truth which We cant deny.
Despite frequent shutdowns. Government still hasn't learnt. It's rioters not commoners. They are gonna riot whether internet is shut or not. They need to counter misinformation with information. What difference has internet shutdown brought in Manipur? There has been continuous violence since almost 3 months now. Internet shutdowns are useless to avoid violence. It's mostly hurts the local economy in this digital world.
