Discussion IPL 2019 | Winner - Mumbai Indians

[Endgame]

So what does rules say when umpire does a mistake ? Can he correct it by reversing his original decision ?

Sure, there're many such incidents.
In fact DRS is a soft version of that only.
But in no way, straight umpire can call a no-ball on height, give stump or run-out on striker's end.

 

[Jagadeesh]

The difference is in cricket rules.
Straight umpire can't call no-ball (or wide) on height and leg-umpire can't call front foot no-ball or line-wide.
The international umpire immediately rectified his partner's mistake.

For Your Kind Information,

MCC Law 21.10 :

"By default, it is the bowler's end umpire who calls and signals no-ball. When the judgement of ball height is required (for beamers and short balls), his colleague (the striker's end umpire) will assist him with a signal.
Either umpire may call a bowler for throwing, although the striker's end umpire is naturally better-placed, and so has the primary responsibility."

 

[Sarkar]

Sure, there're many such incidents.
In fact DRS is a soft version of that only.
But in no way, straight umpire can call a no-ball on height, give stump or run-out on striker's end.

That i understood but i am saying umpire is allowed to reverse a decision or not. What rules say ? i don't know rule so asking you. If he is allowed ten why umpire did not reverse their mistake in RCB vs MI match ? If not allowed then why they changed their decision in RR vs csk ?

 

[Endgame]

I think, in day before yesterday's match (Don't remember exactly which match), straight umpire called wide for height and the leg umpire was seen signaling one per over and not calling wide. Commentators pointed it out too. Umpiring had been of shocking standards in this year's IPL, despite having International umpires.

I do agree on the degradation of umpiring standards. But having said that, players can no way interfare on umpiring decisions. I also didn't like Virat's comments after MI match. Not sure, if it was allowed too.

 

[TushShar]

This one, all RCB fans wants, MSD lead RCB in Future.

Not all,I hope that he comes as a mentor and then RCB will become most successful franchise of IPL With the team that they have right now..

 

[Siva]

I do agree on the degradation of umpiring standards. But having said that, players can no way interfare on umpiring decisions. I also didn't like Virat's comments after MI match. Not sure, if it was allowed too.

Found it.

11.2
Sam Curran to Pollard, SIX, launched over deep square leg! Short balls might trouble Pollard but not this harmless drag down at generous pace. Climbs onto the pull and smashes it into the crowd. Curran better be on his toes because Pollard seems to be lining him up
11.2
Sam Curran to Pollard, wide, tries the bumper outside off, a bit too high and well over Pollard's head
11.1
Sam Curran to Ishan Kishan, 1 run, shortish and angling into Kishan who dabs it softly towards backward point

This delivery 11.2 was called a wide by the main umpire, and not by the leg umpire. You can watch the ball in Hotstar as well and the commentary, the KXIP players were furious about it. And what's worse, next ball went for a SIX and we could say that because of that SIX, MI ended up winning the match (It was a last ball finish for this match). These look like very small things, but in the end make a huge impact on the result of the game.

 

[Endgame]

For Your Kind Information,

MCC Law 21.10 :

"By default, it is the bowler's end umpire who calls and signals no-ball. When the judgement of ball height is required (for beamers and short balls), his colleague (the striker's end umpire) will assist him with a signal.
Either umpire may call a bowler for throwing, although the striker's end umpire is naturally better-placed, and so has the primary responsibility."

Since leg-umpire is better placed and has the 'Primary responsibility', he corrected that mistake.
BTW, thanks for sharing the law.

 

[Rajkumar]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1116669518892298240

Source

 

[Jagadeesh]

Since leg-umpire is better placed and has the 'Primary responsibility', he corrected that mistake.
BTW, thanks for sharing the law.

Still, You Defend Your False View.

As Per The Law, Even Though, Leg-Umpire Has Primary Responsibility, Either Of Them Can Call A No-Ball/Wide For Height. So When A Bowler's End Umpire Calls A No-Ball, It Stands. "He Corrected That Mistake" Is A Blunder By Him( The Leg Umpire). He Cannot Correct That. They Can Discuss And If, Leg Umpire Has Different Opinions, He Can Take That To The Third Umpire With The Soft Signal.

 

[M.J.Sadiq]

Some members not able to digest yesterday's win. So they are again trying to exaggerate this issue through their power. Its really bad for a neutral forum. Better this thread stays closed for another 2 days

Winning the game is not having any link with this incident bro. If in case, after this incident, if the decision made it to be a no ball and if CSK wins, then anyone can talk more on this incident and damage CSK's win.

Now, even though many are discussing this, the win is a win only. CSK didn't cheat and won the game.

I am a CSK supporter and Dhoni fan. But what Dhoni did yesterday is not correct.