Then Why did same bodies allow AVOID to Loot common people with Their extremely HIGH VOICE N data Charges for so many years before JIO ....If Charging Extreme HIGH rates for VOICE n Data and Looting "AAM AADAMI" is Fair for AVOID then I see nothing wrong In JIO giving ppl free data n voice for more then 90 days. .
Completely agree with your point. In India, the Business model is clear.
1) Provide an offering of niche service, which is gullible to end-users (like 4G Internet, Cable TV, Dominos Pizza, Movie Multiplex, Starbucks Coffee, etc.) and price it ridiculously high.
2) People have a desire to take these to uplift their 'image' and to be the active and most lavish ones in society.
3) Effectively, it appears to be a "loot" but most people agree to get looted to maintain their 'image'
4) Some kind of disruptor enters the market:
- 4G Internet -> Jio
- Cable TV -> DTH
- Movie Multiplex -> Netflix / Amazon Prime
- an so on...
5) All these existing providers drop their prices to match the disruptor, suffer heavy 'losses', as they did not manage their profits properly while they were looting the end users. Probably the profits flew back to their Parent country (US / UK / China)
6) Now they cry foul over the disruptor and ask the Government to "save their company"
Are Movie Multiplexes next to bite the dust? People are moving away from mainstream cinema to much better Netflix Originals.
Lets wait and watch.