Discussion JioFiber long-standing routing issues

  • Thread starter Thread starter Optimus_Prime
  • Start date Start date
  • Featured
  • Replies Replies: Replies 42
  • Views Views: Views 2,058
Not much better here also

64 bytes from 1.1.1.1:,icmp_seq=1,ttl=64,time=70.3 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1:,icmp_seq=1,ttl=64,time=55.6 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1:,icmp_seq=1,ttl=64,time=96.9 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1:,icmp_seq=1,ttl=64,time=95.3 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1:,icmp_seq=1,ttl=64,time=63.7 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1:,icmp_seq=1,ttl=64,time=95.9 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1:,icmp_seq=1,ttl=64,time=88.7 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1:,icmp_seq=1,ttl=64,time=66.8 ms

Avg,ttl = 64
Avg,time = 79 ms

This is mine as of 18:52

Code:
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                      WinMTR statistics                                   |

|                       Host              -   %  | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |

|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|

|                            192.168.10.1 -    0 |   74 |   74 |    0 |    0 |    1 |    1 |

|                            192.168.29.1 -    0 |   74 |   74 |    0 |    1 |    4 |    1 |

|                            10.208.216.1 -    0 |   74 |   74 |    3 |    4 |    7 |    3 |

|                             172.16.18.1 -    0 |   74 |   74 |   16 |   17 |   20 |   17 |

|                         192.168.128.134 -    2 |   70 |   69 |    0 |   20 |   83 |   16 |

|                           172.27.248.52 -    0 |   74 |   74 |   18 |   20 |   22 |   19 |

|                           172.27.248.35 -    0 |   74 |   74 |   18 |   20 |   23 |   19 |

|                           192.168.44.28 -    2 |   70 |   69 |   16 |   20 |  125 |   19 |

|                   No response from host -  100 |   14 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |

|                   No response from host -  100 |   14 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |

|                   No response from host -  100 |   14 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |

|                   No response from host -  100 |   14 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |

|                   No response from host -  100 |   14 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |

|                             49.44.18.38 -    0 |   74 |   74 |   43 |   45 |   54 |   45 |

|                   No response from host -  100 |   14 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |    0 |

|                         162.158.226.122 -   25 |   37 |   28 |    0 |  172 |  220 |  184 |

|                          162.158.226.91 -   33 |   31 |   21 |    0 |  166 |  193 |  164 |

|                         one.one.one.one -   17 |   42 |   35 |  163 |  166 |  172 |  168 |

|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
 
yes this happens on jio fiber and its not jio's fault. it's the site owners fault of not having premium cloudflare subscription. Clouflare prioritise paid website owners to good load times then free tiers. This costs money but site this these are not meant for high revenue
You are blaming the site owners instead of JioFiber when all others ISPs load the same sites blazing fast and only JioFiber lags in loading those sites. This is not fair.

I am also using JioFiber and facing all the above discussed issues. The affected sites also won't properly load on Jio 5G. If I switch to Airtel 4G/5G, the sites loads pretty fast and without any lag.

Hence I disagree with your opinion. Clearly Jio is at fault here.
 
yes this happens on jio fiber and its not jio's fault. it's the site owners fault of not having premium cloudflare subscription. Clouflare prioritise paid website owners to good load times then free tiers. This costs money but site this these are not meant for high revenue
1. Jio (and Airtel) can peer with Cloudflare and they won't have to pay them neither Cloudflare will need to. It will be like most ISPs. They are not doing so because maybe they got attitude problems?

2. Yes, many sites can pay for it but the thing is, most sites just don't care. It is fine for most ISPs, so why would they want to spend extra money for some users?

And then some sites like OnlyTech comes to the show who got server in the US or Europe. So, it won't help much anyway.
 
Also, it is not just the sites with Cloudflare having issues. There are even websites which are not hosted on Cloudflare and having issues in JioFiber.

Even sites with Cloudflare Argo are not routed properly. See here, routing me to Chennai server instead of Mumbai:

01nAJkM.png
 
if its jio's fault then why are they not fixing it (they are india's top ISP). or it might be cloudflare's greed for money that they are making life of normal site owners miserable as they might be asking more money from jio for proper routing ?
 
if its jio's fault then why are they not fixing it (they are india's top ISP). or it might be cloudflare's greed for money that they are making life of normal site owners miserable as they might be asking more money from jio for proper routing ?
No, they are not asking for money.

It is just that Jio and Airtel don't care about it. Every local ISP have peering with them as well, you think these ISPs are paying them?

And it is Jio who have routing issues randomly to different servers in India itself. So, we shouldn't talk about how Jio isn't willing to fix issues like that.
 
Seems like Jio is having issues even in Mumbai server of Cloudflare. And not just Cloudflare, even Vultr's Mumbai server.

For example,

Vultr Mumbai on Jio:

1WD6Isn.png


Vultr Mumbai on local ISP:

JqH5X32.png


Cloudflare's own website on Jio: (it is using Mumbai co-location)

54HlSZq.png


On local ISP:


UjssLuc.png


Chennai co-location ping seems fine though.
 
And i thought something is wrong on my side from the last two days dreamdth and onlytech are taking time to load on my airfiber
 
Back
Top Bottom