But who will disqualify a apex court justice except impeachment??
- Thread starter Sai Jai
- Start date
- Replies: Replies 120
- Views: Views 13,855
Digital Mastermind
Contributor
- Joined
- 1 May 2011
- Messages
- 2,931
- Reaction score
- 3,275
But who will disqualify a apex court justice except impeachment??
Today SC Bar Association passed 2 resolution.
Also said all pending matter will go to CJI and he will decide.
CJI is the captain of the ship so obviously every decision will go to him
For those who still believes that this is a result of political interference(by present govt more specifically) and not an ego issue among Judges, here is a report for you. How will you counteract this argument ?
'Super sensitive' cases being given to junior SC judges for last 20 years - Times of India
TOI tracked 15 'super sensitive cases of national importance' in the last two decades, including those relating to Bofors, Rajiv Gandhi assassination, L K Advani's trial in Babri masjid demolition, Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake encounter, Best Bakery and the case that changed how BCCI is run. All of them have one thing in common — they were assigned by the then CJIs, not to any of the four senior-most judges of the SC but to 'select benches' headed by junior judges.
There is little evidence to suggest that seniority of judges is a criterion for allocation of cases as was suggested by the quartet of Justices J Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi, Madan Lokur and Kurian Joseph in their letter to the CJI. The manner in which successive CJIs have assigned cases points to a more random selection of benches. Though the dissenting judges did not mention particular cases, apart from confirming that the case of Judge B H Loya was one, the view that "less senior" benches are not as competent does not seem to have cut ice with past CJIs.
'Super sensitive' cases being given to junior SC judges for last 20 years - Times of India
TOI tracked 15 'super sensitive cases of national importance' in the last two decades, including those relating to Bofors, Rajiv Gandhi assassination, L K Advani's trial in Babri masjid demolition, Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake encounter, Best Bakery and the case that changed how BCCI is run. All of them have one thing in common — they were assigned by the then CJIs, not to any of the four senior-most judges of the SC but to 'select benches' headed by junior judges.
There is little evidence to suggest that seniority of judges is a criterion for allocation of cases as was suggested by the quartet of Justices J Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi, Madan Lokur and Kurian Joseph in their letter to the CJI. The manner in which successive CJIs have assigned cases points to a more random selection of benches. Though the dissenting judges did not mention particular cases, apart from confirming that the case of Judge B H Loya was one, the view that "less senior" benches are not as competent does not seem to have cut ice with past CJIs.
Speedmax13
Member
- Joined
- 23 Oct 2014
- Messages
- 326
- Reaction score
- 597
BENCH FIXING :rofl:
Last edited:
Watched PM interview on zee PM indirectly opposed decision of one of 4 judges verdict that says anthem is not mandated in Cinema hall
Must say the interview not looking more than film shooting and in that interview PM indirectly accepted the failure of demonetisation
Must say the interview not looking more than film shooting and in that interview PM indirectly accepted the failure of demonetisation
Last edited:
Congress was satisfied with Crores of Pending cases & Collegium System then there was No danger in Democracy for Judges.
Modi Govt talked about NJAC, Fast Track courts, less holidays in Judiciary then there is Democracy in Danger
& India witnessing JudicialCrisis. Such an Irony...
Since 2014, SupremeCourt interfering in Govt functioning, Hindu Festivals etc.
Did we say Judiciary dictating?
They rejected Kashmiri Pandits, hold Ram Mandir, stopped Rohingyas Deportation.
What is this?
Why Half of SC Judges haven’t made assets public 10 yrs after resolution?
No one questioned Ethics of Judiciary when Teesta got bail on Phone.
Real issues gnawing away at judiciary not addressed in presser by 4 SC judges: corruption, delays, adjournments, collegium opacity, exorbitant counsel fees, decrepit infra in lower courts.......
Modi Govt talked about NJAC, Fast Track courts, less holidays in Judiciary then there is Democracy in Danger
& India witnessing JudicialCrisis. Such an Irony...
Since 2014, SupremeCourt interfering in Govt functioning, Hindu Festivals etc.
Did we say Judiciary dictating?
They rejected Kashmiri Pandits, hold Ram Mandir, stopped Rohingyas Deportation.
What is this?
Why Half of SC Judges haven’t made assets public 10 yrs after resolution?
No one questioned Ethics of Judiciary when Teesta got bail on Phone.
Real issues gnawing away at judiciary not addressed in presser by 4 SC judges: corruption, delays, adjournments, collegium opacity, exorbitant counsel fees, decrepit infra in lower courts.......
Sai Jai
Member
- Joined
- 5 Jan 2015
- Messages
- 39,360
- Reaction score
- 26,262
Watched PM interview on zee PM indirectly opposed decision of one of 4 judges verdict that says anthem is not mandated in Cinema hall
Must say the interview not looking more than film shooting and in that interview PM indirectly accepted the failure of demonetisation
Phew atleast now he admitted indirectly though
