MaxPayne
Member
- Joined
- 1 Jan 2025
- Messages
- 76
- Reaction score
- 137
Apart from the jiostar, bcci influence, retirements of players or anything behind this move, my guess is that this is going to be a good thing for the media companies.
Because they already know clearly about the greedy bcci properties tender values and icc's old fashioned closed bid process, no one will be profitable if they fight each other on the bidding process but the boards itself.
To avoid such cases in the future, they can simply bidding to some extent above the minimum amount of the media rights which determined by the respective boards, then they can later arrange this kind of partnerships to save themselves from the huge losses.
Yes, it will definitely divide the viewership and the revenue as well. But you can't get everything without sacrificing something. Those days are gone.
These media companies are the main culprit for the losses who just wanted to get something / everything at any cost to maintain their monopoly without thinking of the loss in the future.
Because they already know clearly about the greedy bcci properties tender values and icc's old fashioned closed bid process, no one will be profitable if they fight each other on the bidding process but the boards itself.
To avoid such cases in the future, they can simply bidding to some extent above the minimum amount of the media rights which determined by the respective boards, then they can later arrange this kind of partnerships to save themselves from the huge losses.
Yes, it will definitely divide the viewership and the revenue as well. But you can't get everything without sacrificing something. Those days are gone.
These media companies are the main culprit for the losses who just wanted to get something / everything at any cost to maintain their monopoly without thinking of the loss in the future.
JioStar wants One Way TRAFFIC & MONOPOLY...
