First of all it was harshal not siraj. Secondly I'm talking about the Mankad attempt not the run out after. The comment I replied to was making it sound like Harshal did the wrong thing by attempting a mankad
First of all it was harshal not siraj. Secondly I'm talking about the Mankad attempt not the run out after. The comment I replied to was making it sound like Harshal did the wrong thing by attempting a mankad
Harshal didnt make wrong at first place but after he misses the chance in first attempt , he threw the ball from middle of crease which is no brainer at all which is against the rule the law
Harshal didnt make wrong at first place but after he misses the chance in first attempt , he threw the ball from middle of crease which is no brainer at all which is against the rule the law
This is what the law (38.3.1.2 ) states - "Even if the non-striker had left his/her ground before the instant at which the bowler would normally have been expected to release the ball, once the bowler has reached that point it is no longer possible for the bowler to run out the non-striker under this Law."
If only Harshal Patel flicked at the non-striker's stumps with a bit more precision or DK didn't fumble the last ball, this game could have had a different conclusion