Rahulan Raj
Member
- Joined
- 6 Mar 2012
- Messages
- 8,960
- Reaction score
- 789
ABCDEFGH said:World Cup 2011 Had 2 reviews per innings
Yes, not now ; they hv changed the number .... :angry
ABCDEFGH said:World Cup 2011 Had 2 reviews per innings
Rahulan Ratnarajah said:I think ''Free-Hit'' is the stupidest :shy
SaiLaxman said:but it reduced the no ball count :shy:tup ...
ilikered said:Umpires are human beings. Mistakes are meant to happen. Is this the first time we are seeing bad decisions costing the match? Umpteen number of times it happened. With drs, we at least get a couple of chances for saving the match. Look at the world cups, how effectively Indian team has used it!!
Rahulan Ratnarajah said:Then why not ''wide-delivery'' :shy
Sarkar said:why to limit number of review? what happen if the one really needs review comes after all review gone for that team?
Rahulan Ratnarajah said:Why limit number of overs(20%) a bowler can bowl in limited-overs game , where a batsman can play as many balls as he can :lol :s
Sarkar said:Other wise you will not see 300+ runs as the best bowler of opposition will bowl whole match![]()
Rahulan Ratnarajah said:Exactly. That's what limited overs game need.
If there is unlimited reviews, fielding side will take 5 hours to complete the 50 overs :rofl ::shy
All dismissals would be reviewed by batting-side :dodgy
Cricket can be played in empty stadiums only then :wall
Sarkar said:DRS should be Umpire's call not Team's call, if he think it's necessary then he can take or just stick to his decision :k