Complaint lodged against Umpire Vineet Kulkarni ....

[Rahulan Raj]

World Cup 2011 Had 2 reviews per innings

Yes, not now ; they hv changed the number .... :angry

 

[Sai Jai]

I think ''Free-Hit'' is the stupidest :shy

but it reduced the no ball count :shy:tup ...

 

[Rahulan Raj]

but it reduced the no ball count :shy:tup ...

Then why not ''wide-delivery'' :shy

 

[Sarkar]

Umpires are human beings. Mistakes are meant to happen. Is this the first time we are seeing bad decisions costing the match? Umpteen number of times it happened. With drs, we at least get a couple of chances for saving the match. Look at the world cups, how effectively Indian team has used it!!

I fully agree with you bro :tup

Can you plz ans these

why to limit number of review? what happen if the one really needs review comes after all review gone for that team?

Why broadcaster control all review software like hawk-eye ? They can easily manipulate to the system and make some team favourable(with whom they have broadcast right)

Cricket board like Caribbean/Zim cannot pay their cricketers. How will they pay so much cost for these new technology ?

If the ball kisses the wicket in Hawk eye then why Out is not given and onfield not out is given priority ?

 

[Sai Jai]

Then why not ''wide-delivery'' :shy

I heard some where itz under ICC consideration :tup ...

 

[Rahulan Raj]

why to limit number of review? what happen if the one really needs review comes after all review gone for that team?

Why limit number of overs(20%) a bowler can bowl in limited-overs game , where a batsman can play as many balls as he can :lol :s

 

[Sarkar]

Why limit number of overs(20%) a bowler can bowl in limited-overs game , where a batsman can play as many balls as he can :lol :s

Other wise you will not see 300+ runs as the best bowler of opposition will bowl whole match

 

[Rahulan Raj]

Other wise you will not see 300+ runs as the best bowler of opposition will bowl whole match

Exactly. That's what limited overs game need.

If there is unlimited reviews, fielding side will take 5 hours to complete the 50 overs :rofl ::shy

All dismissals would be reviewed by batting-side :dodgy

Cricket can be played in empty stadiums only then :wall

 

[Sarkar]

Exactly. That's what limited overs game need.

If there is unlimited reviews, fielding side will take 5 hours to complete the 50 overs :rofl ::shy

All dismissals would be reviewed by batting-side :dodgy

Cricket can be played in empty stadiums only then :wall

Removal of all Drs rule will save another few hours as batsman takes review even when they are clear out

Moral of the story: DRS should be Umpire's call not Team's call, if he think it's necessary then he can take or just stick to his decision :k

 

[Rahulan Raj]

DRS should be Umpire's call not Team's call, if he think it's necessary then he can take or just stick to his decision :k

No, it shouldn't be.
Then players will bully the umpire to force to use DRS....

Filthy words would be thrown at him & players might be confronting the umpire like in football :no