we want neutral umpire's not favourble or corrupted umpires :udodgy ... btw u favourble for vineet or itz umpiring plz mind he gave not out to duminy plam lbw on that day ....
Umpires are human beings. Mistakes are meant to happen. Is this the first time we are seeing bad decisions costing the match? Umpteen number of times it happened. With drs, we at least get a couple of chances for saving the match. Look at the world cups, how effectively Indian team has used it!!
People who are saying drs is good should know that only 2 reviews are possible in one 1 innings.
So out of the first three batsman if 2 are given out, they ask for reviews and they are indeed out then both the reviews are gone. Now what will be left for the last 7 batsmans?!!! Won't it be injustice
There are few things in cricket which is there to make the game compact & interesting.
In limited over games, 2 batsmen can bat entire innings where a bowler can maximum bowl 20% of the overs... What an injustice :em
No.3 batsman should walk-in as soon as 20% of the total overs is played by opener.... :hehe :dodgy
BTW, u r allowed to use only 1 review in an innings of an ODI :k
It depends on how much time teams r happy to waste for DRS,
In my opinion, in one innings , they could give 5 reviews per each team with the amount of time consumed for decision making should be carried to the team which requested... Impose suspensions & take match-fees if significant delay is caused at the end of the game :tup
Then what is your view abt Hot-spot,Hawk-eye if technology is there means we have to use DRS is a good system but the only problem is review times(2) ....
Umpires are human beings. Mistakes are meant to happen. Is this the first time we are seeing bad decisions costing the match? Umpteen number of times it happened. With drs, we at least get a couple of chances for saving the match. Look at the world cups, how effectively Indian team has used it!!