Discussion Ayodhya Ram Mandir - News & Updates

[Ankush Mehta]

I have always tried to be neutral to everyone. I never forced my ideology on anyone. Being leftist means being communist. Your need proper schooling to understand the difference between being neutral, liberal and communist. In a country like India you can't be true liberal because of its culture based on religion. You can avoid it but can't ignore it. Today's verdict was just that.

Edit : Can't believe you find a serious thing funny. This is your ideology and your love chest-thumping love for the country.

Being leftist means being communist. Your need proper schooling to understand the difference between being neutral, liberal and communist. .

Edit : Can't believe you find a serious topic funny. This is your ideology and your love chest-thumping love for the country.

Ironically you are asking me to get proper education while you think "Being leftist means being communist." Who said all leftist are communist, They can be socialist too, sparing the other terminologies for not so educated kid here.

 

[iDJ]

Ironically you are asking me to get proper education while you think "Being leftist means being communist." Who said all leftist are communist, They can be socialist too, sparing the other terminologies for not so educated kid here.

Leftists generalizes communist.

 

[Rajat Basak]

Anyone here reading full 1045 pages of judgement? It's a beautiful story book on Ayodhya written by our supreme court.

 

[Ashish_91]

I don't understand what ovasi is trying to do by giving such statements

 

[Azhar888]

I really think this disputed land should be given to no party. This has become like a war to some antinationalist. Atlast every people will remain in Harmony. Alternate land should have been given to both parties, such that no dispute is created.
Always INDIAN first..
If I hurted someone's feelings sorry for that, Just an opinion that's all

They should had alloted 5 acre lands to each party and the disputed land to build a hospital,school,garden etc

 

[Itsme...]

They should had alloted 5 acre lands to each party and the disputed land to build a hospital,school,garden etc

No point in doing that. The issue is all about land it self. As the Honorable SC said, there was a temple before mosque was made. If this fact is correct, then the land should go for Ram Temple only. If the fact is false and there was no temple before the mosque, then the land should go for mosque. The court is not going to give verdict on people's faith or nation's peace and harmony. The whole case was all about Lord Ram was born there and there was a temple. The issue was there even before 1992.

 

[iDJ]

My personal thoughts on the decision

Fair verdict IMO. No matter how much they deny. Decision was based on both facts and faith. Both temple and mosque existed as per ACI. You can't change the birthplace (as per beliefs on faith). But you can't re-establish a broken monument elsewhere. Now only thing is left is punishments of the culprits responsible for demolition of the Babri Masjid structure instead of taking legal route. As punishment those responsible should sponsor the construction of the mosque.

Many might be shocked with my beliefs. Usually I would have gone with equal division of land for communal harmony. Growing up my hobby was watching and reading about extremism and violence. After seeing how terrible situation in Jerusalem. Don't want same to happen in my country. Some or other incidents was bound to happen if both temple and mosque would have existed at same place. Keeping this apart is better in every way.

 

[iDJ]

Sunni Waqf board won't seek review petition.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1193114560703524864

Source

 

[Lurie]

2.77+ 67 acres.

Bro, the real Babar masque land is 2.77 acres. Now they given for build Ram temple.

 

[Lurie]

I was watching it on India today and followed it on few Tamil channels like news7, Puthiya thalaimurai and news 18. To my shock, these Tamil news channel due to their political leanings and bigoted nature were freely allowing the wrong facts to be said regarding the judgement and the anchors didn't even correct it. A guy from regional party and a guy from a Muslim party said that sc made a statement that the mosque was constructed independent from the supposed temple and the judgement thrashed the claims made by Hindus but it was completely opposite in the judgement. The anchors didn't even correct it. I was imagining what kind of impact it would cause of those lay people who believe whatever they hear on news.