620Km long 'Women Wall' in Kerala

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raju lal
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 90
  • Views Views: Views 8,930
For you, 10-50 age group is 'small'! That just summarised your 'political agenda'. Quite sure, both of you @Sahil Nikhil & @datmalluguy would've happily accepted this SC verdict if you were under BJP's dictatorship (leadership in your view).
Also don't cry that since you're from Kerala, you owns Sabarimala. As per my constitutional rights (boosted by SC verdict), I've the equal rights to enter there with my WIFE, SISTERS.
Edit: Any temple for that matter!
 
Last edited:
For you, 10-50 age group is 'small'! That just summarised your 'political agenda'. Quite sure, both of you @Sahil Nikhil & @datmalluguy would've happily accepted this SC verdict if you were under BJP's dictatorship (leadership in your view).
Also don't cry that since you're from Kerala, you owns Sabarimala. As per my constitutional rights (boosted by SC verdict), I've the equal rights to enter there with my WIFE, SISTERS.
Edit: Any temple for that matter!

Well, Shah Bano case 1985 under congress proves their dictatorship is much worse than BJP as they even went ahead and overturned SC verdict by passing a new law and still we call Rajib Gandhi a visionary leader
 
Reposting :

RSS filed case in SC in 2006 and asked women to be allowed in Sabarimala.

Also read this article ,

The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh has joined issue and announced that women of all age should be allowed into temples. Critics of the RSS see a deeper game in this declaration, and not any progressive mindset.

*

The Modi government is in favour of all women being allowed at Sabarimala. Said Union minister Venkaiah Naidu to THE WEEK: “The matter is in the Supreme Court. So I wouldn't like to elaborate. My personal view is that there should not be any gender discrimination in places of worship. But, having said that, traditions have to be respected and revisited according to changing times.”


Divine confusion
 
MODI : Supreme Court judgement must be read carefully before reacting to it.

Modi said that the issue relates to tradition and the Supreme Court judgement that saw a dissent by a lady judge should be read carefully.

“There are some temples, which have their own traditions, where men are not allowed, and men don’t go... In the Sabarimala case, a woman judge in the Supreme Court made some observations that need to be read minutely. It is not right attributing it any political party,” Modi said.

Shame that he is our PM. If PM himself don't obey the SC order who will? In a bench , the verdict is based on majority , not based on individual Judges observation.
 
Shame that he is our PM. If PM himself don't obey the SC order who will? In a bench , the verdict is based on majority , not based on individual Judges observation.
Why tamilians won,t obeyed jellikettu verdict?
 
Back
Top Bottom