shawl_who said:
why !! A heel is a heel, whether part time or full time

He potrays negative character, and his mngr, paul heyman is one of d greatest heel mngrs of all time.
No I disagree Brock can never have a lasting impact like a permanent heel can have... now that he was getting crowd support, but WWE put him against taker... does that mean taker takes the heel role or Brock becomes heel for no reason at all,???
WWE lacks good heel characters at the time..
rusev has become meaningless after his loss to cena.. now ko also has become the same...
sheamus's looks are more talked about than his characters...
Seth and authority have got boring .. has beeenn going on for too long...
miz does a good job but is becoming repetitive..
and Wyatt, well he is in a league of his own...he can't be termed as heel or face. . he is a bit of both..