Trai Drops Plans to Impose Extra Fees on WhatsApp, Skype...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Elysian
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 5
  • Views Views: Views 1,152

Elysian

Member
Joined
9 Feb 2014
Messages
189
Reaction score
185
QdDikAU.jpg

In a victory for network neutrality, fair play and common sense, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has decided not to entertain demands from cellular service providers to impose revenue-sharing rules on apps and services which allow users to route calls and messages via the Internet. The proposal would have affected users of several popular apps including WhatsApp, Skype, Viber, Hike, WeChat, and Facebook Messenger

As reported by the Economic Times, Trai has now rejected the idea and even cancelled plans to hold a consultation on the matter. According to the report, Trai feels that revenue losses can be offset by growth in the usage of data services and that there is no need to intervene at this time.

The proposal was made by mobile service providers earlier this month on the basis that they were suffering a loss of revenue due to declining use of cellular voice and SMS services. The move sparked widespread criticism and was seen as a grab for money, since the carriers already charge for Internet connectivity and it should not matter what users do with their services.

The demand for a "level playing field" with free apps, would have actually created a distinction between types of data sent and received by users, in effect restricting usage of apps and services, and giving operators control over what users do with their Internet connections.

Several consumers raised objections to the very idea of imposing fees on specific apps, pointing out that Internet services are already overpriced and are way too slow, by global standards. Such rules would also have set dangerous precedents as to who can potentially claim compensation for loss of revenue from any new player or service provider that disrupts their revenue model in the future.

Trai had held a seminar titled "Regulatory Framework for OTT Services" on August 5, during which various industry stakeholders had put forward their viewpoints. This would have been the first step in a consultation process, which has now reportedly been called off.

 
Ya its a very good news, i always talk to my brother through viber and Skype.
 
Yes, these apps are very important, if they go paid or would be taxed, end-users will have to bear d brunt of it. :dodgy
 
TRAI rejects telcos’
proposal to charge popular
apps


MUMBAI:In a victory for the users
of WhatsApp,Viber,Skype and
other apps,Telecom Regulatory
Authority of India (TRAI)has
decided against a proposal of
carriers to impose extra fees on these popular services.
The cellular service providers placed a
proposal last month for these apps to share a
part of their revenue with them or the
government which allow users to route calls
and messages via the internet.
As reported by the Economic Times, TRAI has
now rejected the idea and also cancelled plans
to hold a consultation on the matter.
According to the report, TRAI feels that
revenue losses can be offset by growth in the
usage of data services and that there is no
need to intervene at this time.
The proposal was given on the basis that the
mobile service providers were suffering a loss
of revenue due to declining use of cellular
voice and SMS services.
With the rise over the-top players (OTTPs),
many subscribers use these apps rather than
their telecom operator's normal voice call and
SMS services, affecting the carrier's revenue.
Hence telcos, having invested billions of
dollars in creating their network, want OTTPs
to be regulated so that both parties operate on
a level playing field.
Operators want the OTTPs—which use their
telecom networks— to pay the same fees that
they pay to the government, which if
implemented will force the app makers to
charge for their services, currently available
for free.
The proposal by the telecom companies
sparked widespread criticism from the
consumers, raising objection to the very idea
of imposing fees on specific apps, pointing out
that the carriers already charge for internet
connectivity.
According to OTT players, seeking payment and
the move to regulate them is against the
concept of free internet or ‘net neutrality’.
TRAI recently held a seminar titled ‘Regulatory
Framework for OTT Services’ bringing several
OTT players face-to-face with operators as a
precursor to regulating the app space in India.
This would have been the first step in a
consultation process, which has now
reportedly been called off http://www.indiantelevision.com/iworld/ott-services/trai-rejects-telcos-proposal-to-charge-popular-apps-140819
 
Back
Top Bottom