Nidahas Trophy 2018 T20 Tri Series | Sri Lanka, India & Bangladesh | updates & Discussions

  • Thread starter Thread starter mask63
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 1,042
  • Views Views: Views 79,961
The visuals I saw, it was 12th man having some heated argument with Perera (after the Not no-ball run-out). So, it all started with Perera.

It was between umpire and ban players, don't know what SL players were doing there
 
It was between umpire and ban players, don't know what SL players were doing there

Sri Lankan Players Were There Because Of Fear...They Were Like Umpire Would Signal No Ball...So They Were Trying To Stop Bangladesh Players From Having A Word With The Umpires..
 
Ok those who backing bangladesh & its dance

Want to remember 1 instance one day in twitter one bangladesh fan put our Indian flag in one animal(don't want to post that animal name) & put bang flag in tiger by saying tiger going to attack *** animal

Would u accept this ?? It'll be blood on urs if others means tomato sauce ??

See bangladesh are overrated team they not worth on it if they win any league match against any underated team they celebrate & overacted that as a lifting world cup trophy that's the pblm

They have to change else they are the sufferer
This one is different
It was between umpire and ban players, don't know what SL players were doing there
Perera insist the leg umpire not to give no ball.
 
This one is different
Also, players can't control fans and these type of 'Fans' are everywhere. We also have such 'Fans' (sadly in our forum too).
We shouldn't bring fan's behavior unnecessarily, there's no relation.
 
There was a No ball, or there wasn't, DSport was running ads, so no official clarification, everything speculated, what was officially broadcasted was the hawk eye presentation of the said balls, which clarified umpires decisions, also no evidence that Perera insisted the umpire, all speculations...
 
There was a No ball, or there wasn't, DSport was running ads, so no official clarification, everything speculated, what was officially broadcasted was the hawk eye presentation of the said balls, which clarified umpires decisions, also no evidence that Perera insisted the umpire, all speculations...
Only one shoulder high bouncer is allowed in T20. Second ball definitely a no ball. Leg umpire raises hand to show no ball. Problem raises here. Just imagine if no ball given, next ball free hit
 
Last edited:
Only one shoulder high bouncer is allowed in T20.
Yes, But Since the first ball wasn't called one for the over, the second wouldn't have been no ball in any case, point is that neither Shakib is allowed to order a no ball nor is Perera allowed to insist the umpire not to call, there have been umpiring blunders a lot of times in the history of cricket, but the brawl afterwards isn't and should not be acceptable, both SL and BAN players were heated up, no point to find who started it, attitudes of players from both sides weren't in the spirit of the game..
 
Yes, But Since the first ball wasn't called one for the over, the second wouldn't have been no ball in any case, point is that neither Shakib is allowed to order a no ball nor is Perera allowed to insist the umpire not to call, there have been umpiring blunders a lot of times in the history of cricket, but the brawl afterwards isn't and should not be acceptable, both SL and BAN players were heated up, no point to find who started it, attitudes of players from both sides weren't in the spirit of the game..
Yes agreed.
 
Back
Top Bottom