Why to limit DRS use only in 3 cases ? Now if more choices given it would lead too many review in a match so that would extend time so DRS should be Umpire's choice not teams choice. By taking review teams are challenging Umpire whereas one should respect Umpire decision so as per me DRS should be Umpire's call
Umpire can call 3rd umpire's help for any decision ;
He doesn't need DRS to talk upstairs :hehe
How u expect an umpire get 2 decisions for one issue ?
If he found batsman nicked an edge , he will give out and when didn't he will say not out...How both ??
I'm afraid I'm explaining football to an American :huh
Umpire can call 3rd umpire's help for any decision ;
He doesn't need DRS to talk upstairs :hehe
How u expect an umpire get 2 decisions for one issue ?
If he found batsman nicked an edge , he will give out and when didn't he will say not out...How both ??
I'm afraid I'm explaining football to an American :huh
If I am not wrong then In DRS every team gets 3 chances to review Umpires decision. If All 3 fails then no chances left. But what happen if 4th One is really not Out ?:huh
If I am not wrong then In DRS every team gets 3 chances to review Umpires decision. If All 3 fails then no chances left. But what happen if 4th One is really not Out ?:huh