India tour of Sri Lanka

[Rushil]

:rofl rofl :lol :lol

 

[Sarkar]

That's giving some credit or tolerance to on field umpires
.. Keeping human factor alive..

Earlier they had 2 out of 3 conditions is enough to overturn On field LBW decisions. .
Now all three required ! Giving advantage to batsman.

With Technology available, u can play the game perfectly without on field umpires also...
It's the traditional human factor , still we want to keep...
Using Technology to eliminate the obvious blunders..not to overturn every decisions...

India can opt for on field umpires decision for run outs also in their argument. ..How u expect an umpire to estimate the projectile with naked eyes & could not decide the run out decision which can be done with naked eyes !!!

No need Human factor as Humans are causing lots of error So ICC should remove all Umpires and put UHD and Ultra slow motion camera in that place and conduct Matches :lol

 

[Rahulan Raj]

Nice one Rushil.D. ..
I think u could play better than these openers also :hehe

 

[Rushil]

Nice one Rushil.D. ..
I think u could play better than these openers also :hehe

I think sri lanka need you :em

i think you will be next captain of SL :tup

 

[ABCDEFGH]

Out of the 5 wickets
Only 1 wicket was a wrong decision

Rest 4 were clear cut out


Now don't tell BCCI have even bought SL players

 

[Rahulan Raj]

So ICC should remove all Umpires and put UHD and Ultra slow camera in that place and conduct Matches :lol

Thats the human factor I'm talking about..
Technology should be used to eliminate blunders only
..

But India s stance on DRS is a joke ; Nothing better !
It gives fair upgrade to everyone to comply with rules..

I think u could understand the logic !

 

[Sarkar]

Out of the 5 wickets
Only 1 wicket was a wrong decision

Rest 4 were clear cut out


Now don't tell BCCI have even bought SL players

Wrong decision is a part of each and every sport just look at Football how many wrong decisions are given :s

 

[ABCDEFGH]

Thats the human factor I'm talking about..
Technology should be used to eliminate blunders only
..

But India s stance on DRS is a joke ; Nothing better !
It gives fair upgrade to everyone to comply with rules..

I think u could understand the logic !

Yes but only 1 or 2 review is possible until you get it right

So if reviews are over and a batmans is given out, then what ?

 

[Rahulan Raj]

Out of the 5 wickets
Only 1 wicket was a wrong decision

Rest 4 were clear cut out


Now don't tell BCCI have even bought SL players

2 decisions buddy...
One no-ball & Other LBW !!!

But both could be back to pavilion even there is DRS on play as more chances created ... Looks like 1st Test final innings. ..

 

[Sarkar]

Thats the human factor I'm talking about..
Technology should be used to eliminate blunders only
..

But India s stance on DRS is a joke ; Nothing better !
It gives fair upgrade to everyone to comply with rules..

I think u could understand the logic !

You didn't comment on this part

Why to limit DRS use only in 3 cases ? Now if more choices given it would lead too many review in a match so that would extend time so DRS should be Umpire's choice not teams choice. By taking review teams are challenging Umpire whereas one should respect Umpire decision so I think(In my opinion BCCI also) DRS should be Umpire's call