Incredible India

[karansembhi2010]

Congratulations India..!!
But it does not mean Isro is ahead of Nasa as thread starter said..
Yes they failed many times but they reached mars years ahead of isro..

ok i take your point Nasa do this a years ahead but don't forget this today Nasa do this thing in 671 Million dollar but india do this in 74 million dollar so if they have better technology then why not they do this in cheap rate

 

[Tech Info]

ok i take your point Nasa do this a years ahead but don't forget this today Nasa do this thing in 671 Million dollar but india do this in 74 million dollar so if they have better technology then why not they do this in cheap rate

both mars mission have different objective and with different tech specification so the cost is not same..but i agree with that isro's mission is cost effective.

 

[karansembhi2010]

both mars mission have different objective and with different tech specification so the cost is not same..but i agree with that isro's mission is cost effective.

Open this link India’s first Mars satellite enters orbit, costing just 11% of NASA’s own Mars mission | ExtremeTech

and read 2nd paragraph then you know who is best

 

[Tech Info]

Open this link India’s first Mars satellite enters orbit, costing just 11% of NASA’s own Mars mission | ExtremeTech

and read 2nd paragraph then you know who is best

"Obviously a direct comparison
isn’t really fair. While
Mangalyaan is a tech demo with
just 15 kilos (33 lbs) of scientific
instruments on board, MAVEN is
a full-fat NASA satellite with 65
kilos of scientific goodness.
MAVEN itself is a much larger
device, too — it had a launch
mass of over 2.5 tonnes, while
Mangalyaan was only just over a
tonne — meaning it needed a
much larger (and more
expensive) launch vehicle to get
into space"
-from the link you have given.
BTW i agree with you in this regard i said this in my previous post too..