Discussion Google Pixel 3a/3a XL

[Bapun]

https://store.google.com/in/product/pixel_3a

 

[Sparker0i]

Confirmed pricing:

Pixel 3a: ₹39999
3a XL: ₹44999

GA May 15th in retail stores and flipkart

 

[Sparker0i]

What is ur source..?
3a base variant starts from around 25K
3a XL starts around 34-35k
Nd yes base variant is 4/64 and another model is 4/128

Nd your OP7 base variant starts from 39,499

Bro as I said earlier, you will be disappointed

 

[Kartik07]

Damn Google....

 

[Siva]

Bro as I said earlier, you will be disappointed

3a and 3a XL are directly competing with OnePlus! I would say it's still a good deal, given the Camera is same as the original Pixel 3. I'm sure these devices can easily beat the OnePlus's camera.

 

[Sparker0i]

3a and 3a XL are directly competing with OnePlus! I would say it's still a good deal, given the Camera is same as the original Pixel 3. I'm sure these devices can easily beat the OnePlus's camera.

Processor, ram, performance will be the biggest disappointments when compared to 1+

Plus when they say budget pixel phones, I was expecting somewhere around ₹30000. 40k is way too much. Spend 15k more and you can get the flagship base edition

 

[Siva]

Processor, ram, performance will be the biggest disappointments when compared to 1+

Plus when they say budget pixel phones, I was expecting somewhere around ₹30000. 40k is way too much. Spend 15k more and you can get the flagship base edition

Pixel is all about Camera and they brought that one to this model. Android Performance on Google owned device should be equivalent or even better compared to OnePlus IMO, i.e. irrespective of Hardware. It should be like an iPhone with perfect S/W and H/W coordination.

And Yeah, Even I think majority would have been happy if it was around 30k. But As I said, their competition seems to be with OnePlus only. If someone is able to spend 15k more, they will get lot many options including S10e.

 

[Bapun]

Source

 

[iDJ]

40k. Wasn't this suppose to be affordable?

 

[Bapun]

40k. Wasn't this suppose to be affordable?

This is 'affordable' model only.

Samsung is charging further more 56k for their cheap model i.e. S10e.