Supreme Court verdict, all TV rights of BCCI to be monitored

  • Thread starter Thread starter rahul1117kumar
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 18
  • Views Views: Views 1,808
Joined
21 Jun 2013
Messages
10,365
Reaction score
11,058
The Supreme Court-appointed Justice RM Lodha panel on Tuesday advised the BCCI to follow “total transparency” with regards to awarding lucrative television rights deals in the wake of the apex court’s verdict on the panel’s recommendations for reforms in the Board.

What has drawn the committee’s attention is the awarding of Media Broadcast Rights awarded by BCCI to broadcast the two T20 Internationals between India and the West Indies in Florida, USA on August 27 and 28, which was announced on Monday by the Board, according to sources close to the panel.

Among the 15 primary points that the BCCI will have to adhere to by October 15 is awarding of TV broadcast contracts.

Well-informed sources close to the panel, who are aware about legal implications, pointed out that even if BCCI files a review petition they will have to abide by the Supreme Court’s verdict on the panel’s recommendations relating to principles of transparency that are needed to be followed in order to award broadcast rights, unless they get a stay order.

“Post July 18 Supreme Court verdict which upholds the Lodha Panel reforms, there should be complete transparency with regards to the principles of awarding contracts. It should be observed rightaway in detail.

“All the details about pre-qualification norms and eligibility criteria should be transparently put up on the BCCI website,” the sources close to the panel told PTI on Tuesday.

On Tuesday BCCI announced that it has signed a deal with Star India Pvt Ltd worth Rs 34.2 crore for telecast of the two-game series in USA.

BCCI reportedly is also set to sign a multi-billion dollar TV contract for the cash-rich IPL once it becomes due but it may come under the scanner if the Supreme Court verdict upholding the panel recommendations are not followed in toto, as per indications.

When asked if in current situation the T20 matches to be played in USA could be broadcast by ‘Star India’ the sources said “I am not saying that they can’t, but one needs to thoroughly check whether all principles of transparency had been followed.”

The wordings of the advertisement on the BCCI’s website inviting tenders for broadcasting the hastily arranged two-game series is believed to have attracted the attention of the panel.

The advertisement on bcci.tv read:The BCCI team will share the ITT document with the interested parties via email based upon the requests and eligibility.

The last date for any such request expressing interest is on or before 05:00 PM IST on 04th August 2016.

“How do I know what is the eligibility to acquire the broadcast rights? The interested party cannot decide what is the eligibility and for that BCCI needs to clearly state what is the eligibility,” the source remarked.

The announcement of the rights being awarded a day before the scheduled meeting of the top BCCI officials with the panel in New Delhi on Tuesday has surprised a few within the Board too, it was learnt.

BCCI secretary Ajay Shirke met the panel members while president Anurag Thakur, an MP, asked for “Leave of Absence” because the Parliament is in session.

Supreme Court verdict, all TV rights of BCCI to be monitored | The Indian Express
 
This all broadcast rights process looks dubious. If the Supreme Court doesn't come into play, Star will most probably win the IPL broadcast rights. They have infact 'bribed' the BCCI by buying the T20 broadcast rights in USA this month. Star are desperate to get the IPL rights at any cost. This all started when they bid for International matches to be played in India.
 
BCCI is a private organization. So Government has no role in it. Don't know why Supreme Court is interfering in its operations instead of looking into serious issues. [emoji19]
 
Sarkar said:
BCCI is a private organization. So Government has no role in it. Don't know why Supreme Court is interfering in its operations instead of looking into serious issues. [emoji19]

What does the SC have to do with govt organisation?
everyone knows bcci is the most corrupt body in india. since its part of india, it ought to be bound by indian judiciary
 
Shadow said:
What does the SC have to do with govt organisation?
everyone knows bcci is the most corrupt body in india.  since its part of india, it ought to be bound by indian judiciary

I can do whatever I like in my company as long as I comply with the local laws. Now betting is illegal in India so police can interfere there as it happened in IPL so judiciary can go ahead and punish those people. 

But if I decide to give some of my contract to some other company X who are you to tell me that I cannot outsource my work to that company ?  :dodgy
 
Sarkar said:
I can do whatever I like in my company as long as I comply with the local laws. Now betting is illegal in India so police can interfere there as it happened in IPL so judiciary can go ahead and punish those people. 

But if I decide to give some of my contract to some other company X who are you to tell me that I cannot outsource my work to that company ?  :dodgy

yeah bro .. But Contract should be neutral not conflict of Interest .. Once conflict of Interest is came to private company then " Y " has no chance other than knocking the door of law :-/ ..
 
dreambox.pk said:
Its a national matter and its indian national team

i dont think its a private matter

I comment about organization not about this matter :k .. BCCI is started by private and running as private but promoting Indian National cricket Team :k ..
 
Back
Top Bottom