Siva Staff member Community Manager Joined 20 Jul 2014 Messages 7,104 Solutions 4 Reaction score 12,703 10 Dec 2018 #541 Pranab said: Means bro?? There was no other Indian Pacers there! Click to expand... I think he's saying, only Bumrah was effective!!
Pranab said: Means bro?? There was no other Indian Pacers there! Click to expand... I think he's saying, only Bumrah was effective!!
Siva Staff member Community Manager Joined 20 Jul 2014 Messages 7,104 Solutions 4 Reaction score 12,703 10 Dec 2018 #542 hemant said: India won fortunately but they were on track to lose, they were certainly short of 80 runs and 400 as target was good. They can lose other test with this target. Click to expand... If the target was 400, Australia could have drawn this match seeing the way they played.
hemant said: India won fortunately but they were on track to lose, they were certainly short of 80 runs and 400 as target was good. They can lose other test with this target. Click to expand... If the target was 400, Australia could have drawn this match seeing the way they played.
Endgame Member Joined 23 Jan 2016 Messages 3,613 Reaction score 4,960 10 Dec 2018 #543 The last stat is wrong @SarfaRaZ bro, here the right one 35 - Catches in this Test, a world record. It bettered the the 34 set in Cape Town earlier this year between Australia and South Africa. All 20 wickets in the second innings of both sides were caught. ESPNCricinfo©
The last stat is wrong @SarfaRaZ bro, here the right one 35 - Catches in this Test, a world record. It bettered the the 34 set in Cape Town earlier this year between Australia and South Africa. All 20 wickets in the second innings of both sides were caught. ESPNCricinfo©
iSK Contributor Joined 16 Jul 2013 Messages 17,804 Reaction score 12,940 10 Dec 2018 #544 Pranab said: The last stat is wrong @SarfaRaZ bro, here the right one 35 - Catches in this Test, a world record. It bettered the the 34 set in Cape Town earlier this year between Australia and South Africa. All 20 wickets in the second innings of both sides were caught. ESPNCricinfo© Click to expand... Yes you're right they copied the old stat n not counted the last wicket .
Pranab said: The last stat is wrong @SarfaRaZ bro, here the right one 35 - Catches in this Test, a world record. It bettered the the 34 set in Cape Town earlier this year between Australia and South Africa. All 20 wickets in the second innings of both sides were caught. ESPNCricinfo© Click to expand... Yes you're right they copied the old stat n not counted the last wicket .
Vishnu777 Member Joined 3 Feb 2017 Messages 2,022 Reaction score 2,664 10 Dec 2018 #545 Great..Won the first match of the test itself.. Should carry on the momentum..
iSK Contributor Joined 16 Jul 2013 Messages 17,804 Reaction score 12,940 10 Dec 2018 #548 Pujara Is following Rahul Dravid
A amarnathkvk Member Joined 10 Oct 2014 Messages 2,320 Reaction score 2,713 10 Dec 2018 #549 https://www.facebook.com/121538134524668/posts/2289160404429086 Source