Sparker0i
Contributor
- Joined
- 13 Aug 2017
- Messages
- 7,846
- Reaction score
- 9,254
The "and" along with positioning of commas would've made a huge difference.
- Thread starter Shark
- Start date
- Replies: Replies 1,097
- Views: Views 42,485
JackYU
Member
- Joined
- 2 Jun 2022
- Messages
- 1,844
- Reaction score
- 3,318
Even if it was "and" the central contract part becomes completely irrelevant. Why would a player who hasn't been part of playing XI in last 5 years still have a central contract?
They could have just ignored central contract part and it wouldn't have made any difference at all
Sparker0i
Contributor
- Joined
- 13 Aug 2017
- Messages
- 7,846
- Reaction score
- 9,254
From cricbuzz, this would still not ensure that teams don’t keep bidding higher to reduce other purses using the leverage of RTM cards:
The highest bidder will be given one final opportunity to raise their bid for a player before the team holding the RTM card can exercise their right. For example, if Team 1 holds the RTM for Player X and Team 2 has placed the highest bid of Rs. 6 Cr, then Team 1 will be first asked if they will exercise RTM, if Team 1 agrees, then Team 2 will have the chance to increase their bid. If Team 2 raises their bid to Rs. 9 Cr, then Team 1 can use the RTM and acquire Player X for INR 9 Cr. If Team 2 chooses not to raise the bid and keeps it at Rs.6 Cr, Team1 can use the RTM and get Player X for Rs.6 Cr
The highest bidder will be given one final opportunity to raise their bid for a player before the team holding the RTM card can exercise their right. For example, if Team 1 holds the RTM for Player X and Team 2 has placed the highest bid of Rs. 6 Cr, then Team 1 will be first asked if they will exercise RTM, if Team 1 agrees, then Team 2 will have the chance to increase their bid. If Team 2 raises their bid to Rs. 9 Cr, then Team 1 can use the RTM and acquire Player X for INR 9 Cr. If Team 2 chooses not to raise the bid and keeps it at Rs.6 Cr, Team1 can use the RTM and get Player X for Rs.6 Cr
Deep Mody
Contributor
- Joined
- 22 Feb 2020
- Messages
- 7,488
- Reaction score
- 17,178
The franchises argue that the essence of the RTM is to establish a player's market value, and this purpose is not served when a franchise is required to match an arbitrarily raised bid. As clarified by the BCCI, the increase can be any amount, which diminishes the value of the incremental bid at that stage. Cricbuzz can confirm that some franchises have formally written to the BCCI, while others have engaged in discussions with its officials.
It is also being pointed out that the new rule can be counterproductive to the BCCI's main goal of attracting as many star players as possible to the auction. By setting INR 18 crore and INR 14 crore for players ranked No. 4 and No. 5 retentions, the BCCI appears to be discouraging franchises from pursuing retention. Critics argue that this new RTM clause does not exactly align with that idea and the franchises may now opt for more retentions instead of going for the RTM option.
It is also being pointed out that the new rule can be counterproductive to the BCCI's main goal of attracting as many star players as possible to the auction. By setting INR 18 crore and INR 14 crore for players ranked No. 4 and No. 5 retentions, the BCCI appears to be discouraging franchises from pursuing retention. Critics argue that this new RTM clause does not exactly align with that idea and the franchises may now opt for more retentions instead of going for the RTM option.
Deep Mody
Contributor
- Joined
- 22 Feb 2020
- Messages
- 7,488
- Reaction score
- 17,178
somnath chakraborty
Contributor
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2017
- Messages
- 31,515
- Reaction score
- 52,741
As mayank yadav now a capped player lsg now won't retain him less than 4cr
Sparker0i
Contributor
- Joined
- 13 Aug 2017
- Messages
- 7,846
- Reaction score
- 9,254
The final decision is that of the player. Don’t think a fast bowler is going to agree for 4cr
Similar threads
