Discussion How India will handle significantly higher costing of Satellite internet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bapun
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 20
  • Views Views: Views 861

Bapun

Staff member
Community Manager
Joined
3 Nov 2010
Messages
28,687
Solutions
14
Reaction score
40,518
Currently, Starlink’s hardware costs range between ₹25,000-₹35,000, with a monthly subscription estimated at ₹5,000-₹7,000. This is significantly higher than India’s average broadband cost of ₹700-₹1,500 per month. For widespread adoption, SpaceX may need to introduce India-specific pricing or partner with government-backed digital inclusion programmes.

 
Currently, Starlink’s hardware costs range between ₹25,000-₹35,000, with a monthly subscription estimated at ₹5,000-₹7,000. This is significantly higher than India’s average broadband cost of ₹700-₹1,500 per month. For widespread adoption, SpaceX may need to introduce India-specific pricing or partner with government-backed digital inclusion programmes.
Can this be possible?
I think what Jio and Airtel will do for competitive and cheap pricing is they'll receive the signals from satellite to ODU and from single ODU they'll give give 3-4 connections to people nearby. Similarly they'll give connections by installing ODUs as per requirement nearby people's location. Similar to OFC fatbox and connections concept. Already Jio is doing with Airfiber in apartments from single ODU giving multiple connections.
 
Can this be possible?
I think what Jio and Airtel will do for competitive and cheap pricing is they'll receive the signals from satellite to ODU and from single ODU they'll give give 3-4 connections to people nearby. Similarly they'll give connections by installing ODUs as per requirement nearby people's location. Similar to OFC fatbox and connections concept. Already Jio is doing with Airfiber in apartments from single ODU giving multiple connections.
That might be useful only for few places with people who got money and really need decent internet, wouldn't it.

Otherwise, there will be only one or two people from a single area who would be thinking about getting it due to the pricing, unless Jio and Airtel make the cost a lot lesser. 🤔
 
Wrong title, Why India will handle higher costing?
There is currently no need of satellite internet in India. 5G service and Fiber are enough for us.
 
Wrong title, Why India will handle higher costing?
There is currently no need of satellite internet in India. 5G service and Fiber are enough for us.
Yeah, there is no "need" for it. But it will be useful for plenty of people and businesses, who probably can afford it. Not for us, the regular people.
 
Wrong title, Why India will handle higher costing?
The thread title is fine. India refers to Indian government.

The below part in post #1 talks about support required from government to give the service a push.

For widespread adoption, SpaceX may need to introduce India-specific pricing or partner with government-backed digital inclusion programmes.
 
Wrong title, Why India will handle higher costing?
There is currently no need of satellite internet in India. 5G service and Fiber are enough for us.
There's no Fiber availability from big brands still in tier 2 as well, forget about Tier 3 then. Regarding 5g, some locations are for namesake 5g neither stable in internet nor in coverage. Some villages haven't got 5g yet and as per latest updates of big telecos they've slowed down 5g infra roll outs and taking cautious steps and went back to improve 4g network. In that case this satellite broadband helps.
 
Factories, schools, colleges and banks in villages are waiting for fast internet (satellite) instead of BSNL's wireless leasedline of 2 mbps to 10 mbps. So, space fiber will adversely impact BSNL broadband and leasedline business in rural areas.
 
Back
Top Bottom