Samsung Galaxy F52 5G

  • Thread starter Thread starter Prithi Deb
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 3
  • Views Views: Views 796

Prithi Deb

Contributor
Joined
17 Apr 2019
Messages
8,416
Solutions
1
Reaction score
11,392
Uu0doUP.jpg

3Md10vC.jpg

cs9LBy5.jpg

44T3GlY.jpg

 
LCD, as expected. 😂
A twitter user said In 2020 Samsung had confusion between Exynos or SD. Now it is between IPS LCD vs AMOLED and HD vs FHD. Honestly samsung does not understand what market demands. Take M 42 5G for example. Adding FHD display with a punch hole camera and pricing between 25k would have make it a hit. But then they have a habit of not giving a decent product. They will compromise in something for sure. Either price will be high or Specs will be bad for price. This F52 5G will be priced between 25-30k. Seriously who wants a TFT LCD display in that range?!
 
A twitter user said In 2020 Samsung had confusion between Exynos or SD. Now it is between IPS LCD vs AMOLED and HD vs FHD. Honestly samsung does not understand what market demands. Take M 42 5G for example. Adding FHD display with a punch hole camera and pricing between 25k would have make it a hit. But then they have a habit of not giving a decent product. They will compromise in something for sure. Either price will be high or Specs will be bad for price. This F52 5G will be priced between 25-30k. Seriously who wants a TFT LCD display in that range?!
Don't know who's even making these decisions. Galaxy M42 5G would've been such an amazing phone if not for that HD+ Display. They could've priced it 2k higher and give a FHD+ Display.

I think they're doing these just to save their A Series phones. If M42 had FHD+ Display, no one would buy A52 or A72. They are also planning to launch A52 5G soon. M42 5G would've definitely killed its sales as well if it was FHD+. That's the only reason I can think of.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom